1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 928 P.2d
  5. 928 P.2d 1010 (1996)
 

BOERS v. PAYLINE SYSTEMS, INC.

9305-03217; CA A87430.

928 P.2d 1010 (1996)

145 Or. App. 1

Frank A. BOERS, Appellant, v. PAYLINE SYSTEMS, INC., an Oregon corporation, A. Roger Pease and Phillip V. Barcellona, Defendants, and Stoel, Rives, Boley, Jones & Grey, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 4, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James M. Baumgartner, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Black Helterline.

Jill D. Bowman, Seattle, WA, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Charles F. Adams and Stoel Rives LLP.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and ARMSTRONG, JJ.

WARREN, Presiding Judge.

This case involves a dispute under the Uniform Commercial Code between a lien creditor and the holder of a perfected security interest in future advances over their relative priorities in the debtor's property. Plaintiff recovered a judgment against defendant A. Roger Pease, which Pease appealed.1 Pease gave Stoel, Rives, Boley, Jones & Grey (Stoel Rives), the law firm that represented him on the appeal of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases