1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 971 F.Supp.
  5. 971 F.Supp. 952 (1996)
 

HARTMAN v. AT&T CORP.

Civil Action No. WMN-95-475.

971 F.Supp. 952 (1996)

Bonnie HARTMAN, et ux. v. AT&T CORP., et al.

United States District Court, D. Maryland.

May 3, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl E. Tuerk, Jr., Mary Rose E. Cook, Cooper, Beckman & Tuerk, Baltimore, MD, Stephen J. Phillips, Levy, Phillips & Konigsberg, New York City, Stephen J. Nolan, Nolan, Plumhoff & Williams, Townson, MD, for Bonnie Hartman and Richard Hartman.

Sharon A. Snyder, Ober, Kaler, Grimes & Shriver, Baltimore, MD, for AT&T Co., NCR Corp.

Kevin M. Murphy, Matthew J. Cuccias, Rockville, MD, Steven P. Benenson, Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti, Morristown, NJ, for Unisys, Sperry Univoc, Sperry Rand Corp.

Andrew P. Fishkin, Edwards & Angeli, New York City, for AT&T.

MEMORANDUM

NICKERSON, District Judge.

Pending before the Court are the motions for summary judgment filed by Defendants AT & T Corp. (Paper No. 9) and Unisys (Paper No. 10). Plaintiffs Bonnie and Richard Hartman have opposed the motions, and Defendants have replied. Upon a review of the pleadings and the applicable law, the Court determines that both motions will be granted.

I. BACKGROUND

In the course of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases