BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS INC. v. AVL SCIENTIFIC CORP.

No. CV 91-4178 RG (Ex).

924 F.Supp. 994 (1996)

BAXTER DIAGNOSTICS INC., Plaintiff, v. AVL SCIENTIFIC CORP., et al., Defendants. And Related Actions.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

April 25, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christie, Parker & Hale, LLP, Carl Kustin, Thomas J. Daly, John D. Carpenter, Art Hasan, Pasadena, CA, for plaintiff.

Thomas J. Manley, J.B. Kelly, Hunton & Williams, Raleigh, NC, William J. Robinson, David J. Meyer, Graham & James, Los Angeles, CA, for AVL Parties.

Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, Sylvia K. Kochler, Atlanta, GA, for defendant-counterclaimant Frank J. Swenson.


ORDER FOR JUDGMENT

GADBOIS, District Judge.

AVL Scientific Corp. ("AVL") obtained a license to use an optical sensor device that measures the concentration of gases in the blood. It alleges that Baxter Diagnostics Inc. ("Baxter") willfully infringed United States Patent No. 4,557,900 and United States Reissue Patent No. 31,879 (collectively, "the Lübbers patent"), which cover this device, by developing single- and double-layer optical blood gas sensor...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases