1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 928 P.2d
  5. 928 P.2d 964 (1996)
 

BLOUSTINE v. FAGIN

No. 86,329.

928 P.2d 964 (1996)

Donald A. BLOUSTINE, Appellant, v. Arnold D. FAGIN, Donita Burns Douglas and Fagin, Hewett, Mathews and Fagin, a professional corporation, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Oklahoma, Division 3.

As Corrected October 14, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John L. Harlan, Sapulpa, for Appellant.

John B. Hayes, Oklahoma City, for Appellee.

Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CARL B. JONES, Judge:

Appellant, Bloustine, sued his attorneys, Fagin, Douglas and their lawfirm for legal malpractice as a result of the attorneys' failure to properly perfect an appeal from a divorce decree. He contends that had the appeal been properly perfected the appellate court would have resolved...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases