1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 688 So.2d
  5. 688 So.2d 1176 (1996)
 

HILLIARD v. AMOCO PRODUCTION CO.

Nos. 95-1366, 95-1367.

688 So.2d 1176 (1996)

Donald HILLIARD, et al., Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. AMOCO PRODUCTION COMPANY, Defendant—Appellant. Lorraine L. BOLYARD, et al., Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. AMOCO PRODUCTION COMPANY, Defendant—Appellee.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

October 9, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Noble Moore Chambers, Jr., Crowley, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Francis Douglas Wimberly, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before THIBODEAUX, COOKS, SAUNDERS, WOODARD and AMY, JJ.

SAUNDERS, Judge.

These two suits were instituted on behalf of plaintiffs who are the land owners within the confines of the P.L. Lawrence No. 2 Well. The plaintiffs, who are the mineral interest owners in this production unit, have sued the defendant, Amoco Production Company, for interest, double royalties, and attorney's fees due to the alleged unreasonable delay in the payment of royalties.

FACTS

In the latter part of 1987, the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases