1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 925 P.2d
  5. 925 P.2d 913 (1996)
 

STATE EX REL. JUV. DEPT. v. FINCH

945665; CA A88004.

925 P.2d 913 (1996)

144 Or. App. 42

In the Matter of Jonathan Dee Finch, a Child. STATE ex rel. JUVENILE DEPARTMENT OF LINCOLN COUNTY, Respondent, v. Jonathan Dee FINCH, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 9, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey C. Hollen, Newport argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Richardson, Ouderkirk & Hollen.

Kaye E. Sunderland, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before DEITS, P.J., and De MUNIZ and HASELTON, JJ.

HASELTON, Judge.

Child appeals an order finding him within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court for acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4)(a).1 He assigns error to the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress. We review de novo, ORS 419A.200(5), and reverse.

The material facts are uncontroverted.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases