1000 FRIENDS OF OREGON v. LCDC

94-Remand-931; CA A85351.

912 P.2d 919 (1996)

139 Or. App. 485

1000 FRIENDS OF OREGON, Petitioner, v. LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION, Respondent, and Yamhill County, Intervenor.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 6, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

F. Blair Batson, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

John T. Bagg, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

John C. Pinkstaff, Assistant County Counsel, argued the cause for intervenor. With him on the brief was John M. Gray, Jr., Yamhill County Counsel.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and ARMSTRONG, JJ.


ARMSTRONG, Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of LCDC's periodic review order for Yamhill County. It contends that LCDC erred by concluding that the county's minimum parcel size requirements that permit parcels of fewer than 80 acres to be created in certain mixed agricultural/forestry zones comply with Goal 4 and OAR 660-06-026, a provision of the Goal 4 implementing rule.1 We affirm.

The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases