CLAYSBURG II TOWERS v. BENCHMARK CLAYSBURG

No. 5:95 CV 075.

953 F.Supp. 861 (1996)

CLAYSBURG II TOWERS, Plaintiff, v. BENCHMARK CLAYSBURG, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.

October 30, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel P. Mascaro, Michael Kevin Farrell, Mark R. Koberna, Cleveland, OH, for plaintiff.

M. Neal Rains, Susan V. Belanger, Cleveland, OH, for defendants.


ORDER

NUGENT, District Judge.

Pursuant to the Memorandum and Opinion filed simultaneously herewith, this Court holds that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that Defendants are entitled to summary judgment in their favor as a matter of law pursuant to FED.R.CIV.P. 56(c). Therefore, the Motion of Defendants for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 9) is GRANTED.

In addition, Defendant's Amended Request for Relief in Pending Motion for Summary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases