HILSTROM v. STATE

No. CR 96-563.

923 S.W.2d 874 (1996)

325 Ark. 317

Keith Cox HILSTROM, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

July 8, 1996.


Motion for Rule on Clerk.

PER CURIAM.

On June 3, 1996, a motion by appellant for rule on clerk was denied because the attorney for appellant, James O. Cox, did not admit fault. The appellant's attorney was given thirty days from the date of the per curiam to file a motion and affidavit accepting full responsibility for not timely filing the transcript. Appellant, Keith Cox Hilstrom, by his attorney, James O. Cox, has filed a second motion for rule on the clerk...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases