1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 680 So.2d
  5. 680 So.2d 1091 (1996)
 

HEMMERLE v. GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE

No. 96-0288.

680 So.2d 1091 (1996)

Kenneth HEMMERLE, Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a New York Corporation, and General Motors Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Appeal Dismissed October 30, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth V. Hemmerle, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.

Walter M. Dingwall of the Law Office of Walter M. Dingwall, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee General Motors Acceptance Corporation.

James M. Redmond of Wicker, Smith, Tutan, O'Hara, McCoy, Graham & Ford, P.A., Miami, for Appellee-General Motors Corporation.

Appeal Dismissed as to General Motors Acceptance Corp. October 30, 1996.

ORDER DETERMINING TIMELINESS OF APPEAL

PER CURIAM.

While considering a motion to dismiss an appeal from an order awarding attorney's fees, we asked the appellant to show cause why the appeal from final judgment should not be dismissed since his motion for new trial was not served within ten days of the directed verdict. If the motion for new trial was not timely served...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases