MILLER v. WATER WONDERLAND IMP. DIST.

94-CV-0387-AB, CA A88388.

918 P.2d 849 (1996)

141 Or. App. 403

Roy MILLER, Appellant, v. WATER WONDERLAND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT and Walter J. Seaborn, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 12, 1996.

Review Allowed August 6, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roy Miller filed the briefs pro se.

Max Merrill and Merrill, O'Sullivan, MacRitchie, Petersen & Dixon, Bend, filed the brief for respondent.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and ARMSTRONG, JJ.


EDMONDS, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals a summary judgment dismissing his complaint that sought a declaration that he had the right to inspect the records of defendant Water Wonderland Improvement District (WWID) pursuant to the Public Records Law, ORS 192.410. ORCP 47. Plaintiff also appeals the denial of his cross-motion for summary judgment, the trial court's dismissal of defendant Seaborn pursuant to ORCP 21A(8) and the trial court's award of costs to WWID. Based on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases