STATE v. SARGENT

CC C91-07-33376; CA A72824; SC S41128.

918 P.2d 819 (1996)

323 Or. 455

STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review, v. Gary Lee SARGENT, Petitioner on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided June 27, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David E. Groom, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on petition was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Janet A. Klapstein, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With her on response was Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before CARSON, C.J., and GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, FADELEY, UNIS, GRABER and DURHAM, JJ.


FADELEY, Justice.

Police officers executed a warrant to search an apartment in Portland for evidence related to heroin trafficking. The warrant was based on observations that had been made earlier during the service of an arrest warrant at the same premises. The police officers obtained various items of evidence of heroin trafficking and use. Based on that evidence, defendant, his wife, and others were charged with possession, delivery, and conspiracy to deliver heroin...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases