1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 940 F.Supp.
  5. 940 F.Supp. 792 (1996)
 

MARINO v. SPORTS AUTHORITY

Civil No. 95-7517.

940 F.Supp. 792 (1996)

Antonio MARINO, et al. v. The SPORTS AUTHORITY, Brook-Crompton Co., Roadmaster Corp., and General Electric Co.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

September 20, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald J. Smolow, Trevose, PA, for plaintiffs.

Robert Douglas Billet, Philadelphia, PA, for Sports Authority and Roadmaster.

Mary Catherine Roper, Drinker, Biddle & Reath, Philadelphia, PA, for General Electric.

Norris D. Wolff, Kleinberg, Kaplan, Wolff & Cohen, P.C., New York City, Richard D. Director, Matzkin & Director, Allentown, PA, for Brook-Crompton Company.

MEMORANDUM

RAYMOND J. BRODERICK, District Judge.

Presently before the court is Plaintiffs' motion, pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules for Civil Procedure, for certification of two nation-wide classes of consumers who owned or purchased "Vitamaster" exercise treadmills since October 1994, which treadmills allegedly contain motors which overheat and catch fire. The Plaintiffs' first proposed class...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases