1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 675 So.2d
  5. 675 So.2d 1055 (1996)
 

ARCHON v. UNION PACIFIC R.R.

Nos. 94-C-2728, 94-C-2743.

675 So.2d 1055 (1996)

Kathleen ARCHON, et al. v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD, et al. MELTON TRUCK LINES v. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 2, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald Coleman Brown, Woodley, Williams, Fenet, Boudreau, Norman & Brown, for Applicant (No. 94-C-2743).

Paul H. Due, Thomas M. Abrusley, Donald Wayne Price, Due, Caballero, Price & Guidry; James T. Guglielmo, Charles M. Jarrell, Guglielmo, Lopez, Tuttle, Hunter & Jarrell, for Respondent (No. 94-C-2743).

ON REHEARING

WATSON, Justice.

On original hearing, this court held that the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development assumed a contractual duty to provide active warning signals at the Van-Ply crossing. Archon v. Union Pacific Railroad, 94-2728, 94-2743 (La. 6/30/95), 657 So.2d 987. Rehearing was granted to consider the DOTD's contention that the opinion erroneously equated active signals (automatic...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases