1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 917 P.2d
  5. 917 P.2d 790 (1996)
 

ROSEBUD ENTERPRISES v. IDAHO PUBLIC UTIL.

No. 20910.

917 P.2d 790 (1996)

128 Idaho 633

In the Matter of Application of Idaho Power Company for Authority to Ratebase the Investment Required for Adding Capacity to the Twin Falls Hydroelectric Facility. ROSEBUD ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, Petitioner-Appellant, v. IDAHO PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION and Idaho Power Company, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, December 1995 Term.

May 30, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Orndorff & Trout, Boise, for appellant. Owen H. Orndorff argued.

Alan G. Lance, Attorney General; Bradford M. Purdy, Deputy Attorney General argued, Boise, for Idaho Public Utilities Commission. Bradford M. Purdy argued.

Evans, Keane, Boise, for Idaho Power. Larry Ripley argued.

SCHROEDER, Justice.

This is an appeal from Idaho Public Utilities Commission (IPUC) Orders No. 25160 and 25021. In these orders the IPUC accepted Idaho Power Company's (Idaho Power) offer of an estimated upgrade cost for its Twin Falls hydroelectric plant and permitted the estimate to serve as a cap for the amount Idaho Power may include in its future ratebase. The IPUC also recognized that Idaho Power will be allowed to recover in its revenue requirement its prudently...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases