1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 675 A.2d
  5. 675 A.2d 1032 (1996)
 

BROWN v. WHEELER

No. 1301, Sept. Term, 1995.

675 A.2d 1032 (1996)

109 Md. App. 710

Octavia BROWN, a Minor, et al. v. Carel WHEELER, et al.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

May 6, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Saul E. Kerpelman, Baltimore, for appellants.

Sandra B. Minton (Robert K. Nead and Nead, Hoffman & Karey, on the brief), Baltimore, for appellees.

Argued before BISHOP, HOLLANDER and EYLER, JJ.

EYLER, Judge.

Suit was filed by appellants, Octavia Brown and her mother, Latina Williamson, against appellees, Carel and Luella Wheeler, the owners of a rental dwelling, seeking damages for injuries caused by exposure to lead paint. The questions presented, as paraphrased, are:

1. Did the trial court err in denying appellants' motion to enter upon property owned by the appellees to conduct an inspection to determine the presence of lead paint?

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases