1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 914 P.2d
  5. 914 P.2d 779 (1996)
 

STATE v. DIEMEL

No. 33867-6-I.

914 P.2d 779 (1996)

81 Wash.App. 464

The STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Nicholas Louis DIEMEL, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

April 29, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nielsen & Acosta, Seattle, for Appellant.

Robin Fox, King County Pros. Atty's Office, Appellant Div., Seattle, for Respondent.

GROSSE, Judge.

Nicholas Louis Diemel, convicted of third degree rape, contends the trial court erred in denying his motion for an in camera review and inspection of the complainant's counseling records. The trial court's determination that Diemel did not make the requisite particularized showing that the counseling records were likely to contain material relevant to the defense was a proper exercise of discretion. This threshold showing required by

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases