PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges the revocation of his community control, and the imposition of a sentence of imprisonment. Because there was sufficient evidence to support the determination that the appellant willfully and substantially violated the conditions of community control, the revocation is affirmed. However, on remand the court should amend the revocation order to reflect the specific violations as orally pronounced. Gregg v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.