SHRUM, Judge.
Plaintiff sued to partition farm real estate in which she claimed an interest as a tenant in common with Defendants. Defendants' answer denied that Plaintiff had any interest in the land and alleged that Plaintiff's petition failed to state a cause of action. Defendants' answer pled that Defendants were in possession of the farm, that "Plaintiff is not entitled to partition pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 96[,]" and that Plaintiff's suit was barred by...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.