ENSMINGER v. TERMINIX INTERN. CO.

No. 95-3314.

102 F.3d 1571 (1996)

Danny ENSMINGER and Cynthia Ensminger, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, a limited partnership, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

December 31, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas J. Lasater (Lyndon W. Vix with him on the briefs), Fleeson, Gooing, Coulson & Kitch, L.L.C., Wichita, KS, for Defendant-Appellant.

Robert T. Cornwell, Law Offices of Robert T. Cornwell, Wichita, KS, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, and PORFILIO and HENRY, Circuit Judges.


JOHN C. PORFILIO, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal, Terminix International Company contends a jury's adverse verdict is infested with error which the district court failed to repair when it denied post-trial motions for judgment as a matter of law and new trial. Concluding Terminix has infused the issues with its own interpretation of the elements of a claim of fraud by silence under the structure of Kansas law, we affirm.

In purchasing a home in a Wichita suburb...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases