SCHOIBER v. EMRO MARKETING CO.

No. 95 C 5726.

941 F.Supp. 730 (1996)

Robert SCHOIBER, Plaintiff, v. EMRO MARKETING COMPANY and Edward Gonzalez, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

October 3, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John P. De Rose, Kenneth A. Jatczak, John P. De Rose & Associates, Burr Ridge, IL, for plaintiff Robert Schoiber.

Richard R. Winter, McBride, Baker & Coles, Chicago, IL, for defendants Emro Marketing Company, and Gonzalez.


OPINION AND ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge:

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act proscribes sexual harassment of one gender by the other. Period. A claim for same-gender sexual harassment is not cognizable under Title VII.

I. PREFACE

As a preliminary matter, the court notes that its opinion in this case addresses only one issue: whether Title VII prohibits sexual harassment, as opposed to general gender discrimination, among members of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases