1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 944 F.Supp.
  5. 944 F.Supp. 723 (1996)
 

JONES-BEY v. WRIGHT

No. 3:95-CV-0789AS.

944 F.Supp. 723 (1996)

Nathaniel JONES-BEY, Plaintiff, v. Charles WRIGHT, Charles Stang, Charles Motley, M.D., Laurie Ebling, Andre Lawson, James Kimmel, Dawn MacMillan, Michael T. Scott, Paula Gott, Purnell Sparks, W. Dobson, and D. Davis, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division.

October 30, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nathaniel Jones-Bey, Westville, IN, Pro Se.

Suzann W. Lupton, Office of Indiana Attorney General, Indianapolis, IN, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ALLEN SHARP, Chief Judge.

Nathaniel Jones-Bey ("Jones-Bey") filed this pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and invoking this court's federal question subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343(a)(3). Jones-Bey's complaint alleges that former Maximum Control Complex ("MCC") Superintendent Charles Wright and several other MCC officials violated his federally protected rights by placing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases