CLEVELAND BAR ASSN. v. DROE

No. 96-1466.

77 Ohio St.3d 89 (1996)

CLEVELAND BAR ASSOCIATION v. DROE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided November 13, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert S. Belovich, K. Ann Zimmerman and Timothy J. Fitzgerald, for relator.

William G. Droe, pro se.


Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. Our Ethical Considerations require that having undertaken representation, a lawyer should use proper care to safeguard the interests of his clients. Respondent not only failed to use proper care on behalf of his clients, but deceived them into believing that he was attending to their interests. We have repeatedly pointed out to the lawyers of Ohio that if an attorney expects to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases