1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 94 F.3d
  5. 94 F.3d 1569 (1996)
 

GREAT NORTHERN CORP. v. HENRY MOLDED PRODUCTS, INC.

Nos. 95-1517, 95-1518.

94 F.3d 1569 (1996)

GREAT NORTHERN CORPORATION and Fibreform Containers, Inc., Plaintiffs/Cross-Appellants, v. HENRY MOLDED PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing Denied September 25, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George H. Solveson, Andrus, Sceales, Starke & Sawall, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, argued, for the plaintiffs/cross-appellants. With him on the brief was Peter C. Stomma.

Joseph A. Brown, Hartman, Underhill & Brubaker, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, argued, for the defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was Christopher S. Underhill. Also on the brief was Dinesh Agarwal, Shlesinger, Arkwright & Garvey, Arlington, Virginia.

Before MICHEL, Circuit Judge, SMITH, Senior Circuit Judge, and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.

CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.

Henry Molded Products, Inc. (Henry Molded) seeks review of the decision of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin, Great Northern Corp. v. Henry Molded Prods., Inc., Civil Action No. 92-CV-386 (E.D.Wis. May 22, 1995), which held that: claim 1 of its U.S. Patent No. 5,080,314 (the '314 patent) is invalid due to anticipation, the '314 patent is invalid for failure to disclose the best mode, and Great Northern...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases