HORST v. LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS, INC.

Civil Action No. 94-D-1525.

917 F.Supp. 739 (1996)

Daniel R. HORST, Jacqueline S. Horst and Daniel R. Horst, Trustee, Plaintiffs, v. LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS, INC., and Laidlaw Waste Systems (Colorado), Inc., f/k/a GSX Denver Regional Landfill, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Colorado.

February 28, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lance F. Astrella, Thomas R. Rice, Astrella & Rice, P.C., Denver, CO, for Plaintiffs.

Gale T. Miller, Davis, Graham & Stubbs, Denver, CO, Lawrence W. Treece, John D. Fognani, Margaret B. Graham, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Denver, CO, for Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DANIEL, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is an antitrust case wherein Plaintiffs ("Horsts") assert three claims under sections one and two of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, 2. The underlying dispute centers around a piece of real property in Erie, Colorado which was subject to a purchase option agreement between the Horsts and Defendant Laidlaw Waste Systems (Colorado) Inc. ("Laidlaw Colorado"), a waste...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases