IN RE NASDAQ MARKET-MAKERS ANTITRUST LITIGATION

M.D.L. No. 1023. 94 Civ. 3996 (RWS).

929 F.Supp. 723 (1996)

In re NASDAQ MARKET-MAKERS ANTITRUST LITIGATION.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

June 6, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fine Kaplan and Black, Philadelphia, PA (Arthur M. Kaplan, of counsel), Lovell & Skirnick, L.L.P., New York City (Christopher Lovell, of counsel), Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, Hynes & Lerach, San Diego, CA (Leonard B. Simon, of counsel), for Plaintiffs.

Shearman & Sterling, New York City (Joseph T. McLaughlin, James T. Halverson, of counsel), Liaison Counsel for Defendants and Defendant Herzog, Heine, Geduld, Inc.

Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City (John L. Warden, Michael Lacovara, of counsel), for Defendant Goldman, Sachs & Co.


OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

This opinion sets out the reasoning underlying this Court's Joint Pretrial Order Number 3 (the "Pretrial Order"), dated March 18, 1996, which ordered, inter alia, that the plaintiffs in this consolidated proposed class action be given access to certain materials related to Civil Investigative Demands ("CIDs") made of the defendants by the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice (the "DOJ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases