WIDNALL v. B3H CORP.

Nos. 95-1042 through 95-1044.

75 F.3d 1577 (1996)

Sheila WIDNALL, Secretary of the Air Force, Appellant, and Logistics Techniques, Inc., Appellant, v. B3H CORPORATION, Intervenor, and Martin Marietta Technical Services, Inc., Intervenor. B3H CORPORATION, Appellant, v. Sheila WIDNALL, Secretary of the Air Force, Appellee, and Logistics Techniques, Inc., Intervenor, and Martin Marietta Technical Services, Inc., Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

February 8, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shalom Brilliant, Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation Branch, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued for appellant, Sheila Widnall, Secretary of The Air Force. With him on the brief were Frank W. Hunger, Assistant Attorney General and David M. Cohen, Director. Also on the brief were Colonel C. Richard Pennington and Major H. Josseph Batey, Air Force Legal Services Agency, Arlington, Virginia, and Clarence D. Long, III, Department of the Air Force, Office of the General Counsel, Washington, D.C., of counsel. Charles W. Mahan, of Dayton, OH, argued for appellant, Logistics Techniques, Inc., in no. 95-1042 and intervenor, Logistics Techniques, Inc., in nos. 95-1043 and 95-1044.

Ira E. Hoffman, McAleese & Associates, P.C., McLean, Virginia, argued for intervenor, B3H Corporation.

James F. Worrall, Venable, Baetjer, Howard & Civiletti, Washington, D.C., representing intervenor, Martin Marietta Technical Services, Inc.

Before NEWMAN, LOURIE, and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judges.


CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.

The Secretary of the Air Force (Air Force) and Logistics Techniques, Inc. (LOGTEC) appeal the July 8, 1994 decision of the General Services Administration Board of Contract Appeals (GSBCA or Board), B3H Corp. v. Department of Air Force, GSBCA No. 12813-P, 94-3 B.C.A. (CCH) ¶ 27,068, 1994 WL 372020 (1994), granting the protest of B3H Corporation (B3H) in a best value procurement.1 B3H cross-appeals...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases