SECOND MOTION TO DIRECT COMPLIANCE WITH ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT RULES 4-3(g) AND 4-3(h).
PER CURIAM.
This is the second time that the State has moved to direct the appellant to comply with Supreme Court Rules 4-3(g) and 4-3(h). The State first filed a motion to comply on April 30, 1996, and the appellant filed a corrected brief on July 30, 1996. The State now complains that over 20 rulings adverse to the appellant have still not been abstracted. We further...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
