1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 79 F.3d
  5. 79 F.3d 1572 (1996)
 

MAHURKAR v. C.R. BARD, INC.

No. 95-1225.

79 F.3d 1572 (1996)

Dr. Sakharam D. MAHURKAR, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. C.R. BARD, INC., Davol Inc. and Bard Access Systems, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing Declined May 3, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond P. Niro, Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro, Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were John C. Jakes, Michael P. Mazza and Davis J. Sheikh.

H. Ross Workman, Workman, Nydegger & Seeley, Salt Lake City, Utah, argued for defendants-appellants. With him on the brief were Brent P. Lorimer and David R. Wright.

Before ARCHER, Chief Judge, MICHEL, and RADER, Circuit Judges.

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Declined May 3, 1996.

RADER, Circuit Judge.

Dr. Sakharam D. Mahurkar sued C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol Inc., and Bard Access Systems, Inc. (Bard) for infringing U.S. Patent No. 4,808,155 (the '155 patent). A jury found that the '155 patent is not invalid for obviousness. The jury also found that Bard infringed the '155 patent both literally and under the doctrine of equivalents...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases