HALL v. AQUA QUEEN MFG., INC.

Nos. 96-1014 to 96-1021.

93 F.3d 1548 (1996)

Charles Prior HALL and WBX Partners, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AQUA QUEEN MANUFACTURING, INC., and Water & Wood Corp., and Vinyl Products Manufacturing, Inc., and Atlanta Vinyl, Inc., and Classic Corporation, d/b/a Classic Flotation Sleeping Systems, Inc., and Land & Sky, Ltd., and United States Watermattress Corporation, and Easy Rest, Inc., d/b/a Strobel Manufacturing, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

August 28, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward S. Wright, Flehr, Hohbach, Test, Albritton & Herbert, Palo Alto, California, argued, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Scott D. Baker, Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May, Oakland, California, argued, for defendants-appellees Aqua Queen Manufacturing, Inc. and Land & Sky, Ltd. With him on the brief, were Ezra Hendon, and Morgan W. Tovey. Of counsel were Peter W. Davis and Valarie Mark.

Roderick G. Dorman, Christie, Parker & Hale, Pasadena, California, argued, for defendant-appellee Water & Wood Corp. With him on the brief, was Syed A. Hasan.

Edouard V. Rosa, Huebner & Rosa, Los Angeles, California, argued, for defendant-appellee Vinyl Products Manufacturing, Inc. With him on the brief, was Harlan P. Huebner.

Stephen E. Blaine, Callahan, Blaine & Williams, Irvine, California, argued, for defendants-appellees Atlanta Vinyl, Inc., Classic Corporation, d/b/a Classic Flotation Sleeping Systems, Inc., and Easy Rest, Inc., d/b/a Strobel Manufacturing. With him on the brief, was Graig R. Woodburn.

John C. Laprade, Laprade & Associates, Washington, D.C., argued, for defendant-appellee United States Watermattress Corporation. With him on the brief, was Steven W. Teppler. Also on the brief was Bruce A. Jagger, Brunton & Jagger, Glendale, California.

Before MICHEL, PLAGER, and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judges.


Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge MICHEL. Opinion concurring in the result filed by Circuit Judge PLAGER.

DECISION

MICHEL, Circuit Judge.

Charles P. Hall and WBX Partners1 (collectively, Hall) appeal from eight separate decisions of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, all issued on August 31, 1995, granting summary judgment in favor of a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases