1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 84 F.3d
  5. 84 F.3d 1544 (1996)
 

U.S. v. BORDEAUX

Nos. 95-3299, 95-3317.

84 F.3d 1544 (1996)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Darwin Thomas BORDEAUX, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Augustin WHITE HORSE, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided June 10, 1996.

Rehearing and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc Denied in No. 95-3317 July 15, 1996.

Rehearing Denied in No. 95-3299 July 22, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Al J. Arendt, Pierre, SD, argued, for appellant Bordeaux.

Carl F. Haberstick, Huron, SD, argued, for appellant White Horse.

Dennis R. Holmes, Asst. U.S. Atty., Sioux Falls, SD, argued, for appellee.

Before FAGG, JOHN R. GIBSON, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges.

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

Darwin Thomas Bordeaux and Augustine White Horse were convicted in the district court1 of kidnapping, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 1153, and 1201(a)(2), and of voluntary manslaughter, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 1153, and 1112. Both appeal their convictions of the kidnapping charge and the denial of their motions to sever the trial. White Horse also appeals the district court's

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases