1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 83 F.3d
  5. 83 F.3d 79 (1996)
 

U.S. v. FRANKSON

Nos. 95-5358, 95-5386.

83 F.3d 79 (1996)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Derrick Myran FRANKSON, Defendant-Appellant (Two Cases).

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided April 29, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Janis Ruth Harvey, Law Offices of Janis R. Harvey, Baltimore, Maryland; Gil S. Amaral, Walker & VanBavel, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Philip S. Jackson, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Roland Walker, Walker & VanBavel, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Lynne A. Battaglia, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, and HALL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

WILKINSON, Chief Judge:

Appellant Derrick Myran Frankson challenges his convictions for drug trafficking under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). Frankson contends that his Miranda warnings were too general, that he never formally waived his Miranda rights, and that Miranda requires police to readvise suspects of their rights when the interrogation does...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases