1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 955 F.Supp.
  5. 955 F.Supp. 663 (1996)
 

FRITH v. JOHN DEERE CO.

Civil Action No. 3:93-0862.

955 F.Supp. 663 (1996)

Billy J. FRITH, et al. Plaintiff, v. JOHN DEERE CO., et al. Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Monroe Division.

June 11, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

M. Terrance Hoychick, Young Hoychick & Aguillard, Eunice, LA, John Hoychick, Jr., Cotton, Bolton, Hoychick & Doughty, for Billy J. Frith and Louise Frith.

J. Michael Percy, Percy, Smith, Foote & Gadel, Alexandria, LA, for John Deere Co. and Deere & Co.

Richard A. Sayles, Sayles & Lidji, Dallas, TX, J. Michael Percy, Percy, Smith, Foote & Gadel, Alexandria, LA, for Nippendenso America Inc.

MEMORANDUM RULING AND ORDER

MELANÇON, District Judge.

Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed jointly by the defendants, The John Deere Company, Deere & Company (Deere), and Nippendenso America, Inc. (Nippendenso). Also before the Court is Defendant Nippendenso America, Inc.'s separate Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons that follow, defendants' joint motion is granted; Nippendenso America, Inc.'s separate motion is denied...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases