1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 94 F.3d
  5. 94 F.3d 1519 (1996)
 

U.S. v. ROGERS

No. 94-4692.

94 F.3d 1519 (1996)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George G. ROGERS, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

September 17, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard C. Klugh, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, for Appellant.

Madeleine R. Shirley, Lisa T. Rubio, Linda Collins Hertz, U.S. Attorneys, Miami, FL, for Appellee.

Before EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge, and FAY and GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judges.

FLOYD R. GIBSON, Senior Circuit Judge:

A jury found appellant George Rogers guilty of committing various firearms violations named in a three count indictment. He now appeals the convictions, claiming that reversible error occurred when the district court failed to instruct the jury on an essential element of each of the offenses. Though the evidence presented at trial is insufficient to sustain the jury's verdict on one of the three counts, we deem the instructional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases