ZAMARRIPA v. SIFUENTES

Appeal No. 04-96-00145-CV.

929 S.W.2d 655 (1996)

Gregorio ZAMARRIPA, Appellant, v. Bianca SIFUENTES and Charles Rakosky, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio.

September 11, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joe R. Greenhill, Jr., Craig Andrew Nevelow, Wright & Greenhill, P.C., Austin, for Appellant.

Bruce J. Mery, Law Offices of Bruce J. Mery, Karl E. Hays, Law Offices of Karl E. Hays, San Antonio, for Appellees.

Before RICKHOFF, STONE and HARDBERGER, JJ.


STONE, Justice.

The question presented in this appeal is whether the default judgment entered was interlocutory or final. We hold that the judgment entered in this case was interlocutory and we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Procedural History

Appellees, as plaintiffs below, took a default judgment on a personal injury claim on August 19, 1994. At some point that same day, appellant's counsel filed an answer to the petition. Thereafter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases