1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 921 F.Supp.
  5. 921 F.Supp. 656 (1996)
 

U.S. v. HUGHES

No. CR 96-31 TUC JMR.

921 F.Supp. 656 (1996)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Melvin F. HUGHES, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Arizona.

March 29, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Reese V. Bostwick, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff.

Andrew H. Fried, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant.

ORDER

ROLL, District Judge.

The Court has UNDER ADVISEMENT defendant's motion to suppress statements based upon alleged violation of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). The defendant maintains that government agents improperly proceeded to question him after he asked to call an attorney. He argues that his subsequent statements must be suppressed. For the reasons...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases