STATE v. MO. PUBLIC SERVICE COM'N

No. WD 50687.

917 S.W.2d 650 (1996)

STATE of Missouri, ex rel. MISSOURI CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. The MISSOURI PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, United Telephone Company of Missouri, Respondent, MCI Telecommunications, Midwest Independent Coin Payphone, Intervenor-Appellant, Bourbeuse Telephone Company, Mid-Missouri Group (Mid-Missouri Telephone Co.), AT & T Communications of the Southwest, Inc., Intervenor-Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

March 19, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeremiah D. Finnegan, Finnegan, Conrad & Peterson, Kansas City, for appellant.

Robert J. Hack, General Counsel, Jefferson City, for Respondent, Missouri Public Service Commission.

Katherine C. Swaler, St. Louis, for Respondent, Southwestern Bell.

Thomas A. Grimaldi, Overland Park, Kansas, for Respondent, United Telephone Company of Missouri.

Carl James Lumley, Clayton, for Intervenor-Appellant, MCI Telecommunications.

William M. Barvick, Jefferson City, for Intervenor-Respondent Midwest Independent Coin Payphone.

William Ross England, III, Jefferson City, for Intervenor-Respondent Bourbeuse Telephone Company.

Craig Steven Johnson, Jefferson City, for Intervenor-Respondent, Mid-Missouri Group.

Paul Deford, Kansas City, for Intervenor-Respondent, AT & T Communications of the Southwest, Inc.

Before BRECKENRIDGE, P.J., and ULRICH and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.


ULRICH, Judge.

Missouri Cable Television Association (MCTA) appeals the trial court's order affirming the Public Service Commission's Report and Order in which the Public Service Commission (PSC) offered to regulate Southwestern Bell Telephone (SWBT) by a method referred to as the Accelerated Modernization Plan. MCTA, an intervenor, claims the trial court erred in finding that the PSC had authority to regulate SWBT under an alternative regulation plan and in finding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases