1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 76 F.3d
  5. 76 F.3d 1480 (1996)
 

DUNCAN v. STUETZLE

No. 94-55598.

76 F.3d 1480 (1996)

Nancy DUNCAN, individually and d/b/a "Footsie Wootsie Machine Rentals"; Just Vibrations International, Inc., a California corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Al STUETZLE; Lexington Scenery & Props, a California corporation; Ken Acton; Amuze, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided February 21, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew N. Chang, Kelly, Herlihy & Bane, San Francisco, California, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Steven J. Adamski, Esner, Higa & Chang, San Francisco, California, for defendants-appellees.

Before: POOLE, BOOCHEVER, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

In this fifth round of litigation over rights to a foot massage device, we explore the boundaries of state and federal jurisdiction over trademark infringement.

I

Nancy Duncan, and her company, Just Vibrations International, Inc., produce and distribute "Footsie Wootsie" foot massage machines designed in the shape of a chair. In early 1990, Al Stuetzle met with Duncan, allegedly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases