BUSCHEL v. METROCORP.

Civil Action No. 96-CV-3048.

957 F.Supp. 595 (1996)

Bruce BUSCHEL, Plaintiff, v. METROCORP., d/b/a Philadelphia Magazine, Elliott Kaplan, and Carl A. Solano, Esquire, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

September 17, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul J. Drucker, Paul J. Drucker, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, for Plaintiff.

Nancy J. Gellman, James J. Rohn, Conrad, O'Brien, Gellman & Rohn, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, for Defendants.

Wilbur L. Kipnes, Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis, Philadelphia, PA, for Carl A. Solano.


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

McGLYNN, District Judge.

Before the court is the Defendant Carl A. Solano's Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth below, the Defendant's motion is GRANTED.

I. FACTS1

This case arises out of a dispute over the existence of an oral contract between plaintiff, Bruce Buschel ("Buschel"), and defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases