1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 76 F.3d
  5. 76 F.3d 1471 (1996)
 

U.S. v. SCARANO

No. 94-10213.

76 F.3d 1471 (1996)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricardo SCARANO, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided February 20, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael H. Murray, Law Offices of Michael H. Murray, Pleasanton, California, for defendant-appellant.

Ross W. Nadel, Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, California, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, THOMPSON, Circuit Judge, and REA, District Judge.

REA, District Judge:

Appellant Ricardo Scarano appeals from a judgment and sentence of the district court imposing consecutive terms of incarceration for two counts of mail fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1341. Scarano contends that the district court's decision to impose the sentences consecutively, rather than concurrently, violated the Double Jeopardy Clause. Alternatively, Scarano contends that the district court's imposition of consecutive sentences violated the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases