1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 919 F.Supp.
  5. 919 F.Supp. 624 (1996)
 

LUMEX, INC. v. HIGHSMITH

CV 96-0855 (ADS).

919 F.Supp. 624 (1996)

LUMEX, INC., Plaintiff, v. Greg HIGHSMITH and Life Fitness, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

March 19, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rains & Pogrebin, P.C., Mineola, New York (Frederick D. Braid, Mark N. Reinharz, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Freeborn & Peters, Chicago, Illinois (Steven M. Hartmann, of counsel), for defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SPATT, District Judge.

This is a lawsuit by a former employer to enforce the terms of a non-competition agreement, sometimes referred to as a restrictive covenant. The two companies involved, the former employer and the prospective new employer, are in the business of manufacturing and selling machines and equipment used in the health fitness industry. Before the Court is a motion for a preliminary injunction by the former employer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases