1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 917 F.Supp.
  5. 917 F.Supp. 624 (1996)
 

CHAMBERS v. OSTEONICS CORP.

No. IP 93-1060-C M/S.

917 F.Supp. 624 (1996)

William E. CHAMBERS and Beverly Chambers, Plaintiffs, v. OSTEONICS CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division.

February 26, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

F. Boyd Hovde, Townsend Hovde & Montross, Indianapolis, Indiana, for Plaintiffs.

William P. Wooden, Mary L. Titsworth, Wooden McLaughlin & Sterner, Indianapolis, Indiana, for Defendant.

ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

McKINNEY, District Judge.

This matter pends on the motion of defendant Osteonics Corporation ("Osteonics") for summary judgment on the issue of preemption. Specifically, Osteonics argues that the state law claims brought by plaintiffs, William Chambers ("William") and Beverly Chambers (the "Chambers"), are preempted by the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 ("MDA") to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases