1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 81 F.3d
  5. 81 F.3d 1453 (1996)
 

U.S. v. SALEMO

No. 95-10028.

81 F.3d 1453 (1996)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George Paul SALEMO, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided April 10, 1996.

Rehearing Dismissed May 28, 1996.

As Amended on Denial of Rehearing May 28, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Artmore L. Baggot, Phoenix, Arizona, for defendant-appellant.

Mark E. Aspey, Assistant United States Attorney, Phoenix, Arizona, for plaintiff-appellee.

Before ALARCON, KLEINFELD and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

Rehearing En Banc Dismissed May 28, 1996.

ALARCON, Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents a novel question: Does section 3006A of the Criminal Justice Act require a district court to compensate an attorney who serves solely as an advisor at the request of an indigent defendant who has asserted his or her right to self representation? We conclude that section 3006A does not authorize a district court to compensate an...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases