CITY OF SPRINGFIELD v. AQUIZAP

No. 94-50059, 94-08395; CA A88648 (Control), A89019.

927 P.2d 601 (1996)

144 Or. App. 190

CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, Respondent, v. Rick Anthony AQUIZAP, Appellant. STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Rick Anthony AQUIZAP, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 16, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edmund J. Spinney, Springfield, filed the brief for appellant.

Douglas F. Zier, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.


PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his conviction of a violation of ORS 814.090(1)(a).1 The state concedes the trial court erred in overruling his demurrer because ORS 814.090(1)(a) violates Article I, section 8, of the Oregon Constitution. We agree with the state's concession.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases