BRUCE H. LIEN CO. v. THREE AFFILIATED TRIBES

Nos. 95-3916, 96-1013.

93 F.3d 1412 (1996)

BRUCE H. LIEN COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THREE AFFILIATED TRIBES; Russell D. Mason, Sr., as member of the Three Affiliated Tribal Business Council; Marty Fox; Daylon Spotted Bear, as member of the Three Affiliated Tribal Business Council; Ivan Johnson, as member of the Three Affiliated Tribal Business Council; Austin Gillette, as member of the Three Affiliated Tribal Business Council; George Fast Dog, as member of the Three Affiliated Tribal Business Council; Ed Hall, as member of the Three Affiliated Tribal Business Council; P. Diane Avery, District Judge of the Tribal Court of the Three Affiliated Tribes, Defendants-Appellees. BRUCE H. LIEN COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. THREE AFFILIATED TRIBES; Russell D. Mason, Sr., as member of the Three Affiliated Tribal Business Council; Marty Fox; Daylon Spotted Bear, as member of the Three Affiliated Tribal Business Council; Ivan Johnson, as member of the Three Affiliated Tribal Business Council; Austin Gillette, as member of the Three Affiliated Tribal Business Council; George Fast Dog, as member of the Three Affiliated Tribal Business Council; Ed Hall, as member of the Three Affiliated Tribal Business Council, Defendants-Appellants, P. Diane Avery, District Judge of the Tribal Court of the Three Affiliated Tribes, Defendant.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided August 28, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger A. Tellinghuisen, Spearfish, SD, argued (Thomas K. Schoppert, on the brief), for Bruce H. Lien Co.

James G. Abourezk, Souix Falls, SD, argued, for P. Diane Avery.

Henry M. Buffalo, Jr., Minneapolis, MN, argued, (Joseph F. Halloran, on the brief), for Three Affiliated Tribes and Tribal Business Council Officials.

Before BOWMAN and HEANEY, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE, Senior District Judge.


BOGUE, Senior District Judge.

The Bruce H. Lien Company (Lien or the Company) appeals the District Court's refusal to compel arbitration in Lien's dispute with the Three Affiliated Tribes (Tribes) over matters concerning a tribal gaming operation. The Tribes appeal the District Court's denial of their motion to dismiss. For the reasons stated below, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

I.

The parties to this dispute came together for the purpose...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases