STATE v. HENNINGS

No. 63418-1.

919 P.2d 580 (1996)

129 Wash.2d 512

The STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Valdez Keith HENNINGS and Eric Fulton, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Decided July 18, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nielsen & Acosta, by Lindsay Brown; Seattle, Constance M. Krontz of Washington Appellate Defender Association; and David L. Donnan of Washington Appellate Project, Seattle, for appellants.

Norm Maleng, King County Prosecutor, Robin E. Fox, Deborah A. Dwyer, Calvin G. Rapada, Deputies, for respondent.


GUY, Justice.

The Defendants in these consolidated appeals challenge the validity of restitution orders which were entered more than 60 days after sentencing. Defendants argue that a statutory amendment retroactively expanding the time within which restitution orders may be entered either (a) does not apply to their cases, or (b) violates the ex post facto, bill of attainder, double jeopardy and due process provisions of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases