1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 913 P.2d
  5. 913 P.2d 582 (1996)
 

WARD v. PUREGRO CO.

No. 21581.

913 P.2d 582 (1996)

128 Idaho 366

Earl E. WARD, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PUREGRO COMPANY, a California corporation; Mark Blankenship, an individual, John Does I-V and John Doe Corporations I-V, Defendants-Respondents.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, January 1996 Term.

March 22, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hepworth, Lezamiz & Hohnhorst, Twin Falls, for appellant. Jeffrey J. Hepworth argued.

Hawley, Troxell, Ennis & Hawley, Boise, for respondent Puregro. Gary D. Babbitt argued.

Quane, Smith, Howard & Hull, Boise, for respondent Blankenship. John P. Howard argued.

TROUT, Justice.

This case involves the interpretation of a settlement agreement and release of all claims entered into between the appellant, Earl Ward, and respondent, PureGro Co.

I.

BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Ward is a farmer who resides in Bruneau, Idaho. Early in 1992, he entered into a fertilizer application contract with PureGro, pursuant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases