ACURA OF BELLEVUE v. REICH

No. 95-35509.

90 F.3d 1403 (1996)

ACURA OF BELLEVUE; Alderwood Motors Inc.; Alley Chevrolet; Art Gamblin Motors; Aurora Toyota; Bellevue Lincoln Mercury; Bellingham Chrysler Center; BMW/Subaru of Bellevue; Bowen Scarff Ford/Volvo; Brewer Chrysler Plymouth; Brien Motors Inc.; Brooks Biddle Chevrolet; Burien Nissan; Burien Toyota Inc.; Capitol Coachman; Cornforth-Campbell Motors; Dwayne Lane's Chrysler Plymouth; Evergreen Sportscars Inc. dba Everett Mazda; Evergreen Ford; Fugate Ford Mercury; Glen Grant Chevrolet Geo Mazda Inc.; Good Chevrolet; Gubrud Motor Co. dba Gordon Nissan; Harrington Chevrolet Geo; Hinton Chevrolet Olds Pontiac Nissan dba Hintons; Honda of Kirkland; Honda Auto Center of Bellevue; Huling Bros.; Lee Johnson Chevrolet; Lexus of Seattle; Lynnwood Dodge; Moceri's Puyallup Chrysler Plymouth Inc.; North Seattle Chrysler; Performance Jeep Eagle; Pontiac GMC Truck of Lynnwood; Prestige Ford; Rodland Toyota; Saturn of Bellevue; Saturn of Lynnwood; Sound Ford Inc.; S & K Motors Inc. dba Sound Mazda, Sound Hyundai, Sound Suzuki and Buy Here Pay Here; Seven Motor Corp. dba Sound Subaru Peugeot & Mitsubishi; Southgate Ford; Tacoma Dodge Inc.; Thomason Ford Toyota; West Hills Honda; Winner Lincoln Mercury; Totem Hill Pontiac GMC; Klein Honda; Grey Chevrolet Inc.; Pioneer Ford Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Robert B. REICH, Secretary of the Dep't of Labor; Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division; William Buhl, Administrator of the Dep't of Labor, Wage & Hour Division, Regions 9 & 10; Gordon L. Wilson, District Director of the Dep't of Labor; United States of America, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided July 17, 1996.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard P. Lentini, Ryan, Swanson & Cleveland, Seattle, Washington, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Jeffery Clair, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendants-appellees.

Before: BROWNING and T. G. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, District Judge.


FERN M. SMITH, Judge.

Plaintiffs/appellants appeal the district court's dismissal of their action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Appellants brought this action under the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA"), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-705, against the Secretary and other personnel of the Department of Labor (collectively, "Department") challenging both a Department Administrator's finding that appellants violated child labor laws and the consequential assessment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases