1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 934 F.Supp.
  5. 934 F.Supp. 553 (1996)
 

U.S. v. REYES

No. S3 94 CR 872 (SAS).

934 F.Supp. 553 (1996)

UNITED STATES of America v. Jose REYES, Francisco Medina and Thomas Rodriguez, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

May 21, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bruce G. Ohr, Thomas A. Arena, Assistant United States Attorneys, United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, New York City, for United States of America.

Diarmuid White, New York City, for Defendant Jose Reyes.

Lee Ginsberg, Freeman, Nooter & Ginsberg, New York City, for Defendant Thomas Rodriguez.

OPINION AND ORDER

SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

Defendant Jose Reyes ("Reyes") has moved for a dismissal of the indictment on the ground that the grand jury which returned it was not selected in accordance with the constitution and laws of the United States. Specifically, Reyes argues that the grand jury was selected in violation of the "impartial jury" component of the Sixth Amendment, the equal protection...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases