1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 913 P.2d
  5. 913 P.2d 572 (1996)
 

GRIFFITH v. LATHAM MOTORS, INC.

No. 21202.

913 P.2d 572 (1996)

128 Idaho 356

Peter D. GRIFFITH and Elizabeth E. Griffith, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross Respondents, v. LATHAM MOTORS, INC., an Idaho corporation, and Chrysler Corporation, a foreign corporation, Defendants-Respondents-Cross Appellants. CHRYSLER CREDIT CORPORATION, Counterclaimant-Respondent-Cross Appellant, v. Peter D. GRIFFITH and Elizabeth E. Griffith, husband and wife, Counterdefendants-Appellants-Cross Respondents.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Twin Falls, November 1995 Term.

March 20, 1996.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John L. Gannon, Boise, and Alexanderson, Davis, Rainey, Whitney & Kerrick, Caldwell, for appellants. John L. Gannon argued.

Moffatt, Thomas, Barrett, Rock & Fields, Boise, for respondents. Mark S. Prusynski argued.

JOHNSON, Justice.

This case concerns a vehicle that was a "lemon." We conclude that (1) the manufacturer was liable to the buyers of the vehicle under the Lemon Law, but not for treble damages, (2) the buyers are not entitled to further recovery from the dealer in addition to recovery against the manufacturer, and (3) the buyers are liable to the company for the expenses of dealing with the vehicle after repossession solely...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases